Disclaimer   |   Testimonials   |   Contact Us   |   Site Map


Spondylolisthesis

Spondylolisthesis is the term applied to a condition where one Vertebral Body has "slipped" forward relative to the adjacent Vertebral Body. Spondylolisthesis can be a significant causative factor in the Spinal Stenosis mechanism responsible for the symptoms in some patients. This is reviewed in detail in the next major Section following this one.

DIAGNOSIS

Part of the initial evaluation of a patient with Spinal Stenosis requires a Focused Neurological Examination including the evaluation of the Peripheral Arteries supplying the Lower Extremities. There are some other examinations which can be obtained to evaluate these arteries (such as Ultrasound and Angiography); however, they are much more expensive and unnecessary for every patient.

Neuroimaging Studies

Plain X-rays

Although plain x-rays of the Lumbar Spine allow for the evaluation of some aspects of the Spine's bone structure, they are of limited value since they cannot identify the presence or absence of a Herniated Disc, Synovial Cyst, Hypertrophic Ligamentum Flavum or the degree of Stenosis.

MRI Scan

MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) scan is a non-x-ray technique that is often used as the first (or screening) Neuroimaging study in many patients. While it has some limited usefulness in evaluating bone anatomy, it is an excellent technique for evaluating the Spinal Canal, Disc anatomy, the Nerve Roots and the Spinal Cord (which is rarely involved by Lumbar region pathology since the Spinal Cord "ends" near the T12-L1 level). Oftentimes this is the only Neuroimaging method that we will need. It is also an excellent technology for evaluating tumors (almost always benign) within the Spinal Canal. MRI scanning is also very useful in evaluating the Thoraco-lumbar junction of the Spine. The Thoracic area of the Spine lies just above the Lumbar region and is a frequent location for advanced Degenerative Disease and Herniated Thoracic Disc in older people.

Figure 8A (Left): MRI Scan (Sagittal View) A Large "Far Lateral" Herniated Disc at L3,4 (Horizontal Arrow points to the "Black" oblong Herniated Disc "mass" extending out of the L3,4 Disc Space and pushing into the Spinal Canal). In addition, this patient has multi-level degenerative disease as indicated by the Disc Space collapse at L4,5 & L5,S1. Both levels demonstrate "Disc Bulges" (Up-curved Arrows)

Figure 8B (Right): MRI Scan (Axial View-Same Patient) Far Lateral HNP (Vertical & Oblique Arrows). Hypertrophic Facet Joints (Horizontal Arrows) and Hypertrophic Ligamentum Flavum (Bi-directional Arrows) combine to produce moderate Spinal Stenosis. The Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) appears "white" within the Spinal Canal. The Nerve Roots appear as small "black dots" within the CSF (Down-curved Arrow.)


CT Scan

A CT or CAT (Computerized Axial Tomography) scan is an x-ray examination that is particularly useful for evaluating bone anatomy (including the Facet Joints) of the Spinal Column and (to a lesser extent) the Disc structures. CT Scanning is not part of a routine evaluation of the Spine nor is it often used for "screening" purposes. CT Scanning is vitally important when combined with Myelography.

Myelography

"MYELOGRAPHY" (See Figure 3) coupled with "POST-MYLEOGRAPHIC CT SCANNING" (See Figures 4, 6A, 11A & 11B) is regarded as the "gold standard" Neuroimaging method for evaluating Spine problems. This procedure involves placing a long needle in the patient's lower Lumbar region, through the Dura Mater and into the "Subarachnoid Space" in order to gain access to the Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF). A water-soluble "Dye" substance is injected through the needle into the CSF which then circulates around the Nerve roots and is "visible" on x-ray.

However, this is an "invasive procedure" that we reserve for patients where the MRI Scan has failed to provide adequate information and only when these patients are operative candidates. It is not to be considered as part of a routine evaluation for Spine patients nor is it required for all patients who are to undergo Spinal operative intervention. The specific indications for this procedure are reviewed in our Monograph PART 2 of this Patient Information Series.

PET (Positron Emission Tomography) & other Techniques

Other investigation methods such as bone scanning, bone density testing and PET (Positron Emission Tomography) are generally not required for patients with new onset of symptoms unless that routine testing (such as reviewed in the preceding paragraphs of this document) fails to establish the diagnosis or some additional problem is identified that requires further elucidation (such as a tumor involving the Vertebral Bone).

TREATMENT

STENOSIS CANNOT BE TREATED BY MEDICAL OR NON-SURGICAL METHODS.

The Role of Steroids

Steroids cannot affect the Bone, Facet Joint, Disc or Ligament conditions that are part of this complex condition. Steroids can reduce the swelling of the Nerve Roots that may have occurred as a result of some acute change. Nevertheless, placing a catheter into an already compromised Spinal Canal in the presence of swollen and damaged Nerve Roots is actually placing those Nerve Roots at more risk. A better alternative to manage the ACUTE NERVE ROOT SWELLING, in our opinion, is to use ORAL STEROIDS which, in adequate dosage, will be just as effective and far less dangerous with considerably less cost.

WE STRONGLY CAUTION AGAINST THE USE OF EPIDURAL STEROID INJECTIONS (ESI) IN THE FACE OF HIGH GRADE STENOSIS, PARTICULALRY IN THE PRESENCE OF WEAKNESS OF THE EXTREMITIES.

Surgical Alternatives

All surgical therapies designed to relieve the compression of the Neural elements (Nerve Roots and/or Spinal Cord) caused by LUMBAR SPINAL STENOSIS usually require the removal of those portions of the Spine that are causing the problem. The most frequent operations performed for these diseases involve an avenue of approach from the back (posterior). All of these techniques involve the removal of part or all the "roof" of the Spinal Canal in the affected area. The "roof" of the Spinal Canal is formed by the Lamina of the Vertebra. Removal of the Lamina ON BOTH SIDES is called a "LAMINECTOMY". Removal of the Lamina ON ONLY ONE SIDE is called a "HEMILAMINECTOMY."

There are some "limited" operations that are mainly used for focal and restricted narrowing (with or without a Herniated Disc.) The most common of these procedures involves removing only a thumbnail-size piece of bone from the Lamina in order to gain access to the Spinal Canal where a Herniated Disc fragment is compressing the Nerve Root, in patients with an isolated Synovial Cyst or in those with a limited area of Ligamentum Flavum Hypertrophy. This procedure is called a "LAMINOTOMY" (or opening in the Lamina). The bony canal through which the Nerve Root travels as it leaves the Spinal Canal is called the "Neural Foramen". It is almost always desirable, and frequently fundamentally necessary, to remove part of the roof of this Foramen in order to decompress (relieve pressure on) the Nerve Root. This procedure is called a "Foraminotomy." Any of these procedures can be used in combination to suit the unique technical requirements for any particular patient circumstance.

In the event that a Bone Spur is the culprit causing the Nerve Root compression, it may be possible to remove it. This is usually the case if the Bone Spur originates from the Facet Joint directly behind the Nerve Root. However, if the Bone Spur projects from the front of the Spinal Canal, it may not be possible to safely remove all or any of the Spur. The "decompression" of the Spinal Canal and the affected Neural Foramen is most frequently very successful in treating the symptoms and signs of this problem. While it is quite evident that when all or part of the Bone Spur remains in place, it could continue to enlarge, it is actually UNLIKELY TO CAUSE any further major difficulties provided an ADEQUATE DECOMPRESSION HAS BEEN ACCOMPLISHED.

Modern Surgical Procedures

There are several modern surgical options available to treat Spinal Stenosis. The most advanced method, Minimally Invasive Microendoscopic Surgery is available for many of these patients. These operations are conducted through a short incision made just off the midline to the side of the main problem. This newer technique differs from the more traditional (and very effective) Microsurgical Operation in that in Minimally Invasive Surgery the large muscle fibres (that run vertically on the side of the Spinous Process and Lamina) are SEPARATED (using a specially designed small tubular retractor) rather than stripping muscle from the bone of the Spine, as is done in the case of the more traditional operation. In the more traditional Microsurgical Approach, the muscle would be removed from the bone of the Spine and then held firmly, under considerable pressure, behind steel retractors. (See the differences between the two procedures in Figure 9.)

In both cases, the Lamina (which forms the "roof" of the Spinal Canal) must be removed in order to gain access into the Spinal Canal and perform the required "decompression" of the Nerve Roots which are protected within a leather-like covering (the Dura Mater).

Figure 9: An illustration comparing the extent of muscle damage caused by "retractors" used in Spine operations. The "BLACK" areas (Vertical Arrows) in the 2 MRI scan "cuts" indicate where muscle has been "damaged" by the "Conventional Microsurgery" retractor systems, whereas, it is much less using the Minimally Invasive system.

The MRI scan shown in Figure 9 (ABOVE) depicts the 2 types of procedures and illustrates the difference between the two with respect to muscle damage.

In each case a "Laminotomy" (opening in the roof of the Spinal Canal) is performed. The Minimally Invasive (or Minimal Access System - also called MAST) results in considerably less damage to the Spinal muscles. This is part of the reason why most patients experience less post-operative pain compared to the more Conventional Microsurgical approach. The Minimally Invasive operation can also be used for Bilateral Procedures (operations on both sides of the spine) using a UNILATERAL (one-sided) APPROACH.

It is here where a major difference between the two types of operations becomes apparent to any observer. Under Conventional Microsurgical techniques, the Spinal muscles are stripped widely from the Spinal bones and held under the rigid retractors. When done on both sides of the back, the pain experienced is usually quite significant.

A BILATERAL LAMINECTOMY using a UNILATERAL MINIMALLY INVASIVE APPROACH DOES NOT DISTURB THE MUSCLES ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE SPINE AT ALL. Depending on the technique used, multiple levels can be approached this way (See Figures 12-15.)

In our experience, MANY OF THESE PATIENTS ARE ABLE TO WALK OUT OF HOSPITAL WITHIN SEVERAL HOURS OF SURGERY.

BILATERAL DECOMPRESSIVE LAMINECTOMY USING A UNILATERAL APPROACH
A Major Advance in Spine Surgery

It is now possible, in many patients, using Minimally Invasive Microendoscopic Surgery to actually perform the Laminectomy procedure on BOTH sides (bilateral) of the Spine using a ONE-SIDED (unilateral) APPROACH. This is a significant advance since the post-operative pain is usually much less than in our more traditional approach because we are not stripping muscle from bone. Although this technique is not always possible in all cases, MOST SPINAL STENOSIS PATIENTS CAN BE MANAGED THIS WAY BY A NEUROSURGEON EXPERIENCED IN THIS ADVANCED TECHNIQUE. The underlying anatomical pathological causes of Spinal Stenosis (Hypertrophic Ligamentum Flavum and Hypertrophic Lumbar Facets) can both be successfully relieved using Minimally Invasive procedures.

Bilateral Decompressive Laminectomy with Bilateral Foramenotomies using a UNILATERAL APPROACH is a highly advanced and technically demanding operation. Nevertheless, it constitutes a major technical advance in the treatment of many patients with Spinal Stenosis as a component of their clinical problem. (This advanced procedure is also utilized for the Minimally Invasive Microendoscopic management of certain Spinal Cord Tumors.)

Figure 10A (Left): Anatomical Diagram to Demonstrate the Technique to Perform a Minimally Invasive Microendoscopic BILATERAL LAMINECTOMY using a UNILATERAL APPROACH.

The Paravertebral Muscles remain intact as the special Minimally Invasive "Tube Retractor" separates and preserves the muscles fibres. In this illustration, the Lamina on the side of the tube Retractor has been removed (Curved Arrow). The retractor was then angled towards the opposite side allowing the Neurosurgeon to drill and remove the Lamina (Oblique Arrow) on the OPPOSITE SIDE. The OPPOSITE LAMINA is removed from the INSIDE of the Spinal Canal. The drilling is accomplished within the Epidural Space which requires considerable technical skill. The muscles on the "Opposite" side are never disturbed.

Figure 10B (Right): Our Neurosurgeons performing this procedure through a 16 millimeter diameter tube retractor. The tube has been angled towards the opposite side in a manner similar to the illustration in Figure 10A.


MULTI-LEVEL SPINAL STENOSIS

Degenerative Osteoarthritis resulting in Spinal Stenosis commonly occurs at MULTIPLE LUMBAR LEVELS in many of these patients. Oftentimes a multi-level Decompressive Laminectomy is required in order to adequately relieve the severe stenosis.

Over the past years, we have demonstrated the feasibility to routinely manage Multi-level Lumbar Spinal Stenosis using MINIMALLY INVASIVE UNILATERAL Techniques by incorporating multiple "ports" simultaneously.

The MAJOR ADVANTAGES offered by this technique are:

  • Minimal injury to the paraspinal muscles;
  • Minimal post-operative pain (compared to standard Microsurgical Bilateral Multi-level Laminectomy);
  • Early post-operative mobilization (usually within 4 hours after operation);
  • Early post-operative discharge from hospital (either the same day or on the morning following surgery);
  • Earlier return to work;
  • Reduced overall cost.

Figure 11A (Left): Post-myelographic CT Scan (Axial View) in a 71 year old Female with Rotoscoliosis and Multi-level Degenerative Osteoarthritis. This L2,3 level study demonstrates the Facet and Ligamentum Flavum Hypertrophy resulting in compression of the Nerve Roots within the Stenotic Spinal Canal. The Nerve Roots are the "small black dots" within the Cerebrospinal Fluid (indicated by the "white" area within the Spinal Canal). In this case the Nerve roots are being compressed on either side of the Stenotic Spinal Canal at the points indicated BETWEEN the Curved Arrows.

Figure 11 B (Center): Post-myelographic CT Scan (Axial View-Same Patient). The Stenosis is more severe at this L3,4 level. The Nerve Root compression is primarily resulting from the Hypertrophic Ligamentum Flavum (The "lighter" grey structures indicated by the Curved Arrows.)

Figure 11C (Right): CT Scan (Coronal View-Same Patient). The vertical line drawn through the midline of the L2 Vertebral Body demonstrates the extent of the Rotoscoliosis. There are severe degenerative changes within the L4,5 & L5S1 Disc Spaces as well; however, these have not caused any Neurological problem for the patient.

Figure 12A (Left): Lateral Intra-operative X-ray (Same Patient as Figure 11 & 12) demonstrating the location (at L2,3 & L3,4) and position of the Minimally Invasive Tube Retractors (Arrows.)

Figure 12B (Right): Operative Photo (Same Patient) The Tube Retractors (Surgeon's View) are in position through 2 short vertically oriented incisions (See figure 13 below.)

Figure 13: Intra-operative X-ray (Same Patient as Figures 11 & 12) for localization of the Minimally Invasive Tube Retractors.
The Tubes are placed on the Right Side at the L2,3 & L3,4 levels. (Note the Rotoscoliosis.)

THIS 71 YEAR OLD FEMALE UNDERWENT A BILATERAL INFERIOR ½ OF L2, COMPLETE L3 & SUPERIOR ¾ OF L4 DECOMPRESSIVE LAMINECTOMY WITH MULTI-LEVEL BILATERAL FORAMENOTOMIES. THE MARKEDLY HYPERTROPHIC LIGAMENTUM FLAVUM WAS EXCISED RESULTING IN EXCELLENT DECOMPRESSION OF HER SPINAL CANAL. SHE WAS OUT OF BED AT 4 HOURS POST-OPERATIVE AND DISCHARGED HOME THE MORNING FOLLOWING THE OPERATION. HER PRE-OPERARTIVE CLAUDICATION SYMPTOMS AND NEUROLOGICAL DEFICIT (FOCAL WEAKNESS) WERE RELIEVED IMMEDIATELY.

Figure 14 A (Left): Intra-operative X-ray with placement of 3 Minimally Invasive Tube Retractors. Because of the type and extent of disease in this 56 year old Male Patient, 2 retractors are on the patient's LEFT SIDE (L3,4 & L4,5) and 1 retractor is at L5,S1 on the Right.

Figure 14 B (Right): Intra-operative X-ray (same Patient) for localization of the 3 retractors at L3,4; L4,5 & L5S1.

Figure 15 A (Left): Operative Photo (Same Patient as Figures 13 & 14) Our Neurosurgeons performing MINIMALLY INVASIVE MULTI-LEVEL BILATERAL DECOMPRESSIVE LAMINECTOMIES through 3 separate "ports" in order to RESTORE NEUROLOGICAL FUNCTION, LIMIT THE EXTENT OF PARASPINAL MUSCLE TRAUMA, REDUCE POST-OPERATIVE PAIN, REDUCE HOSPITAL LENGTH OF STAY, REDUCE OVERALL COST AND PERMIT AN EARLIER RETURN TO WORK.

Figure 15B (Right): Photo of Multi-port incisions (Same Patient as Figures 13, 14 & 15A) at 3 weeks post-operative.

THIS PATIENT WALKED AT 4 HOURS POST-OPERATIVE AND RETURNED HOME THE MORNING FOLLOWING OPERATION. HIS NEUROLO0GICAL DEFICITS & SYMPTOMS HAVE RESOLVED.


EXPECTED OUTCOME

Most patients who undergo these operations report that the pain from the incision in the back is not nearly as bothersome as the pain which they experienced preoperatively. In most cases they are essentially immediately free of the severe leg pain that they had previously endured. The majority of patients are mobilized out of bed within four (4) hours post-operative when they are awake and alert and have recovered from the effects of the anesthetic. This early mobilization is important in helping to diminish post-operative muscle spasm. Patients are asked to avoid taking excessive narcotic analgesic (pain reliever) in the early postoperative period in order to allow them to be mobilized. Narcotics make people sleepy. This precludes our staff from allowing patients to be out of bed. The discomfort from the incision is rarely seriously painful. Actually once the patient is out of bed and walking, the pain is usually lessened even further.

In our experience most patients undergoing these Minimally Invasive Decompressive Procedures for Spinal Stenosis are able to leave the hospital either the same day or the morning following surgery.

ALTERNATIVE PROCEDURES

Interspinous Process Decompression System

The "Interspinous Process Decompression System" is a relatively new Minimally Invasive procedure that is used to relieve the Neurogenic Intermittent Claudication symptoms of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.

X STOP® is one such device that has achieved FDA approval at the time of this writing. There are other systems (such as the "DIAM" device, the "Coflex", the "Wallis" and the "Spire") that are becoming available as well. All of these implants are either made from titanium or other long-lasting materials and perform in a similar way. They are inserted between the "Spinous Processes" (the thin projections from the back of the Spinal bones to which muscle and ligaments are attached) of the lower Lumbar Spine.

The therapeutic concept underlying these devices is based upon the clinical observation that Spinal Stenosis patients tend to walk with a "bent forward" posture since they have learned that this is more comfortable. In fact, this posture actually results in a small (although frequently sufficient) degree of "opening" or "enlarging" the Stenotic Spinal Canal. These implants PREVENT THE PATIENT FROM "EXTENSION" AT THE AFFECTED SEGMENT and "force" a slight "forward tilt" (anterior-directed flexion) or NEUTRAL POSITION to the Vertebrae resulting in a similar, more "permanent", opening of the Spinal Canal. The goal for this therapy is to relieve some or all of the "Claudication" symptoms of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and improve a patient's ability to function.

These implants are indicated for treatment of patients aged 50 or older suffering from Neurogenic Intermittent Claudication (pain or cramping in the legs) secondary to a confirmed diagnosis of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and for those patients with moderately impaired physical function who experience relief in flexion from their symptoms of leg/buttock/groin pain, with or without back pain, and have undergone a regimen of at least 6 months of non-operative treatment. The device may be implanted at one or two Lumbar levels.

Figure 16A: (Left) Intraoperative Lumbar Spine x-ray in one of our patients after Minimally Invasive implantation of the "Interspinous Decompression" device at the L4,5 level.

Figure 16B: (Right) Operative Photograph of Medtronic Sofamor-Danek's Interspinous (SPIRE) device prior to implantation in the patient demonstrated in Figure 10A.

All of these implants are designed to be placed between the Spinous Processes of the symptomatic Lumbar levels in order to limit extension of the Spine in the affected area. This altered position may relieve the symptoms of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis in some patients.

This new technology also has the potential for use as "fixation" or "stabilizing" procedure when combined with other Minimally Invasive techniques such as in older patients with a mild form (Grade 1) of Spondylolisthesis and Spinal Stenosis. In this case a Minimally Invasive Decompressive Laminectomy may be combined with the insertion of the Interspinous Decompression System in order to assist in maintaining "stability" of the Spine.

This device should not be used in patients with:

  • an allergy to titanium or titanium alloy;
  • spinal anatomy or disease that would prevent implantation of the device or cause the device to be unstable in the body, such as:
    • significant instability of the lumbar spine
    • an ankylosed segment at the affected level(s)
    • acute fracture of the Spinous Process or Pars Interarticularis
    • significant Scoliosis
  • neural compression causing neurogenic bowel or bladder dysfunction;
  • diagnosis of severe osteoporosis
  • active systemic infection or infection localized to the site of implantation.

Additional Information

Lumbar Disc Herniation & Degenerative Conditions, Part 2 is a comprehensive review of these problems and treatments.

Online Links:

Spine Universe www.spineuniverse.com

eSurgeon http://esurgeon.com/

DISCLAIMER: Every effort has been made by the author(s) to provide accurate and up-to-date information. However, the medical knowledge base is dynamic and errors can occur. By using the information contained herein, the viewer willingly assumes all risks in connection with such use. Neither the author nor Neurosurgical Consultants, p.a. shall be held responsible for errors, omissions in information herein nor liable for any special, consequential, or exemplary damages resulting, in whole or in part, from any viewer(s)' use of or reliance upon, this material.

CLINICAL DISCLAIMER: Clinical information is provided for educational purposes and not as a medical or professional service. Person(s) who are not medical professionals should have clinical information reviewed and interpreted or applied only by the appropriate health professional(s).



LUMBAR SPONDYLOLISTHESIS

Spondylolisthesis is a condition where one Vertebral Body has "slipped" forward (or backwards) upon the adjacent Vertebral Body resulting in a "misalignment" of the Spine. This clinical problem may be the result of a progressive degenerative change in the Facet Joints of the Vertebrae, a traumatic disruption of these Facet Joints or of a congenital structural defect involving the portion of the Vertebra that "connects" the Facet Joint to the Vertebral Body (known as the "Pars Interarticularis").

In the event of a congenital defect, this problem may have never previously been apparent and may only be detected in later years. This term, "Spondylolisthesis", is almost exclusively reserved for alignment problems of the Lumbar Spine and results from a failure of "normal" bone structures to maintain the anatomical alignment of the Spine. This means that one Vertebra (or occasionally two Vertebrae) "slips" forward (or backwards) relative to each other. The degree of slippage is referred to as either Stage 1 (minor slip of less than a 1/3 of the Vertebral Body distance); Stage 2 (slippage of a distance 1/3 to 2/3 of a Vertebral Body) or Stage 3 (slippage of greater than 2/3 of the Vertebral Body distance.) There are some additional "slippage" problems which include dislocation of the Vertebral Body to one side (or "laterally" - a "Lateral Listhesis") which makes surgical correction even more complicated.

Figure 1: Lumbar Myelogram (Lateral View)

37 year old female with complex Spondylolisthesis

Grade 1 "Retrolisthesis" of L4 (Upper Horizontal Arrow), which has slipped backwards (Posterior) relative to the L5 Vertebral Body.

Grade 2 Spondylolisthesis at the L5, S1 level. The L5 Vertebral Body (Lower Horizontal Arrow) has slipped forward on S1.

Note the "back" (Posterior) part of the S1 Vertebra (Vertical Arrow) lies well behind the Posterior corresponding portion of the L5 Vertebral Body just as the Posterior part of the L4 Vertebra lies behind the Posterior corresponding portion of the L5 Vertebral Body.

Figure 2: Post-myelogram CT Scan demonstrating the Congenital "defect" in Spondylolisthesis (same Patient as Figure 1)

The cause of Congenital Spondylolisthesis is a bone defect in the Pars Interarticularis (the bone connection between the Facet Joints and the Vertebral Body). The Pars Interarticularis defect is identified by the bone "gap" (Arrows) in Figure 2.

See Figure 3 for the Post-operative X-ray of this Lady.

CAUSES OF SPONDYLOLISTHESIS

A. Congenital.

In patients with a congenital form of Spondylolisthesis the condition becomes apparent in the late teenage years to the 30's. The "congenital" problem responsible for this is a defect (failure to form) a small bridging Vertebral Bone element called the "Pars Interarticularis" (see Figure 2). This means that one or both Facet Joints of one of the Vertebra have failed to connect to the remainder of its Vertebra resulting in instability.

B. Degenerative.

Most cases of Spondylolisthesis become apparent during or after the late 50's. In these cases the Facet Joints have suffered advanced deterioration and now are incapable of holding the patient's Vertebrae in normal alignment. This Degenerative Arthritis (Osteoarthritis) "deterioration" is due to "micro-trauma" of everyday life occurring over the lifetime of that particular patient and is usually due to a combination of factors such as obesity, activity in sports, weight lifting, heavy work activities, etc. (See "Associated Pathologies" below.)

C. Traumatic.

"Traumatic" Spondylolisthesis is the least common form of this entity. Fractures of one or both Facet Joints of a Lumbar Vertebra may result in this slippage.

SYMPTOMS

These anatomical "misalignments" frequently result in compression of the Neural Elements (Nerve Roots either within the Spinal Canal and/or as they exit the Spinal Canal through the Neural Foramina.) This may cause injury to those Nerve Roots resulting in neurological problems such as weakness and/or sensory impairment in the Lower Extremities which is usually mild in the beginning. In unusually advanced cases, patients may suffer impairment of bowel and/or bladder function in addition to weakness of the muscles of the legs and loss of sensory function in the Lower Extremities and Perineum.

Pain and/or neurological deficit(s) frequently bring this condition to the patient's awareness. The degree of pain varies from one person to the next. Some, with advanced degrees of slippage (Stage 2) may not have had pain in previous years despite the fact that there was instability for many years when their condition was only a Stage 1 variety. Others have minor degrees of slippage and suffer considerable pain.

Associated Pathologies

Spondylolisthesis may be accelerated by or a potential associated "cause" of significant additional structural abnormalities of the Spine.

1. Scoliosis and Rotoscoliosis: Scoliosis (an abnormality described as a "twisted spine" often also has a "rotary" component called "Rotoscoliosis") creates an abnormal "weight bearing" structure resulting in accelerated degenerative changes in the Facet Joints. As demonstrated in Figures 6 & 7, these degenerative and destructive forces cause these Facet Joints to "fail" resulting in "Spondylolisthesis".

2. Herniated Intervertebral Disc: A Herniated Disc may also occur at the Spondylolisthesis level presumably as a result of the "abnormal forces" on the Spondylolisthesis level which also affects the strength and integrity of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament (See Figures 4, 5 & 8 for such examples.)

3. Spinal Stenosis: The progressive degenerative changes that affect the Facet Joints are often accompanied by pathological Hypertrophy of the Ligamentum Flavum. This, in combination with the Hypertrophy of the Facet Joints and the "slippage" of one Vertebra on the next, may result in severe Spinal Stenosis. A case illustration of Stenosis with Spondylolisthesis and a Herniated Disc is presented in Figures 8 & 9.

TREATMENT

Medical

There are NO MEDICATIONS that can affect the INSTABILITY associated with Spondylolisthesis. Anti-inflammatory medications (usually in the form of Non-steroidal medications - also called "NSAIDs") may help in the management of painful flare-ups that are not related to Nerve Root compression. Once Neurogenic Intermittent Cauda Equina Claudication and/or Neurological Deficits related to Nerve Root compression injury occurs, surgical intervention becomes an important consideration.

Surgery

THE FUNDAMENTAL CONCEPT OF THE SURGICAL TREATMENT FOR THE INSTABILITY ASSOCIATED WITH SPONDYLOLISTHESIS INVOLVES ESTABLISHING AND MAINTAINING STRUCTURAL STABILITY OF THE SPINE WHILE RELIEVING PRESSURE ON THE AFFECTED NERVE ROOTS.

In most of these SYMPTOMATIC cases, the indication for surgical intervention becomes quite clear. Since Spondylolisthesis is a condition of INSTABILITY OF THE SPINE, surgical treatment almost always means that some form of "fusion" (stabilization) operation is required. Although we are often able to re-establish the precise anatomical integrity of Spinal Vertebral alignment, for many patients with this condition, the surgeon can reduce the degree of slippage without restoring "perfect" alignment and still obtain a very satisfactory long term clinical result. The degree of the patient's original slippage together with certain anatomical features peculiar to that patient may reduce the probability to achieve a complete anatomical reduction of the slippage; however, rarely does this compromise the end result provided that stability and adequate Nerve Root "decompression" has been achieved.

The surgical process involved in Spondylolisthesis generally requires several distinct steps which are almost always carried out simultaneously. The "fusion" portion usually requires placing a device between the Vertebral Bodies that were previously in misalignment. The goal will be for bone to grow from one Vertebral Body to the adjacent one in order to maintain LONG-TERM STABILITY. Additional STRUCTURAL STABILITY and ALIGNMENT is established with the incorporation of some other form of "fixation" device(s) such as pedicle screws and rods, interspinous fixation device and/or posterior (or postero-lateral) bone fusion. All of this is meant to demonstrate that there are several modern stabilization/fusion methods available. The surgical recommendations are usually discussed on an individual basis with each patient and depend on the particular clinical presentation (including neurological status), age, bone density, degree of slippage, associated structural and medical issues and weight.

Minimally Invasive Procedures

Of particular interest now is the introduction of Minimally Invasive Spinal Fusion techniques. These have some significant advantages as a result of the operations being accomplished with less destruction of the important Spine Muscles by using relatively small incisions. Patients undergoing Minimally Invasive Lumbar Spine Fusion generally experience LESS POST-OPERATIVE PAIN, which means earlier ambulation, shortened hospital stay, less risk to hospital associated complications (including infection), earlier return to work activities and less cost both to the patient and to society in general.

In our experience, most patients are mobilized earlier, are usually walking around the hospital ward within 4 hours of surgery and are discharged from hospital the morning following surgery.

There is one form of Minimally Invasive "stabilization" procedure (called "Interspinous Fixation") that is actually accomplished on an out-patient surgery basis with discharge from the hospital within several hours post-operative (see Figures 4, 5 and 12 below).

Figure 3: Lateral Lumbar Spine X-ray. Post-operative Minimally Invasive "Fusion" procedure (Same Patient as Figures 1 & 2)

Trans-foramenal (2-level) Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) with Pedicle Screws and Rods (Small Horizontal Arrows) has achieved almost perfect anatomical reduction of the Complex Spondylolisthesis in this lady.

Note: Compare the pre-operative Lateral View to this post-operative image to appreciate the excellent reduction of the pre-operative subluxation (dislocation) at both levels.

The Interbody Graft material is "translucent" on x-ray. Its position is indicated by small metallic "markers" imbedded in the "graft" (Right-Angled Arrows).

Figure 4A (Left): MRI Scan (Sagittal View). Grade 1 Spondylolisthesis L4 on L5 in an obese 53 year old Female with a collapsed L4,5 Disc Space (Vertical Arrow) and Stenosis worsened by the Hypertrophic Ligamentum Flavum Posteriorly (Horizontal Arrow pointing to the "black object".) Compare the Ligamentum Flavum and HNP here with the same patient's Axial View MRI in Figure 5A. (See Figures 12A-C for the surgical treatment of this Patient.)

Figure 4B (Center): MRI Scan (Sagittal View-Same Patient). Spondylolisthesis L4 on L5. Collapsed L4,5 Disc Space with Stenosis and Herniated Disc (Arrow).

Figure 4C (Right): Post-myelographic CT scan (Sagittal View-Same Patient). Spondylolisthesis at L4,5 is better appreciated. The Stenosis is indicated by the absence of myelographic dye at the L4,5 level (Curved Arrow). Compare the Spinal Canal diameter at L4,5 to the other levels.

Figure 5A (Left): MRI Scan (Axial View-Same Patient as Figure 4) demonstrating the Herniated Disc @ L4,5 with Spinal Stenosis resulting from Hypertrophic Facet Joints (Horizontal Arrows) and Ligamentum Flavum (Bi-directional Arrows indicate the "black" appearance of the Hypertrophic Ligamentum Flavum.)

Figure 5B (Right): Post-myelographic CT Scan (Same Patient) demonstrating the Herniated Disc on the Patient's Right side (Vertical Arrow). The "normal filling" (by the Myelographic Dye) appearance of the Left Lateral Spinal Dura (Curved Arrow) should be compared to the corresponding area on the opposite side. The Right-angled Arrow points to the small Nerve Roots within the Spinal Canal that are surrounded by CSF. (NOTE: This slice is taken at a slightly different angle and a few millimeters higher than the MRI scan to the Left.)

Figure 6A (Left): Pre-operative Lumbar Myelogram (Lateral View). Grade 2 Spondylolisthesis of L4 on L5 (Vertical Arrows indicate the Posterior aspect of each Vertebra) in a 57 year old Female with a long history of severe low back and Right>Left Leg Pain.

Figure 6B (Right): Pre-operative Post-myelographic CT Scan (Axial View) in this same patient. Note the far advanced degenerative Hypertrophic change of the Right Facet (Horizontal Arrow) and the Rotation of the Vertebral Body (indicated by the "normal" midline positioned Vertical Arrow.)

Figure 7A (Left): Post-operative Lateral Lumbar Spine X-ray (Same Patient as Figure 6) A nearly perfect anatomical reduction after a Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (the Horizontal Arrow indicates the "Markers" embedded in the Fusion device) and Pedicle Screw & Rod Fixation.

Figure 7B (Right): Post-operative Lumbar CT Scan (Coronal View in the Same Patient). The position of the Pedicle Screws is apparent. The "Interbody Bone Fusion" (Curved Arrow) is seen in the Midline. The long-standing "Rotoscoliosis" is more apparent on this study.

Figure 8: Post-Myelographic Lumbar CT Scan Series

A Far Lateral Right L4,5 Herniated Disc, L4,5 Spondylolisthesis and High-Grade
Spinal Stenosis in a 58 year old Female

Figure 8A (Left): The Black Arrow indicates the Far Lateral Herniated Disc. The Right Facet is markedly Hypertrophic and encroaches on the Spinal Canal (Vertical Arrow).

Figure 8B (Center): The next "lower CT slice" shows the Far Lateral HNP (the dark grey area indicated by the Vertical & Horizontal White Arrows and the Black Arrow) as well as the stenosis secondary to the Facet & Ligamentum Flavum Hypertrophy and the Spondylolisthesis.

Figure 8C (Right): The subsequent "lower CT slice" is just below the L4,5 interspace and demonstrates the considerable stenosis secondary to Facet and Ligamentum Flavum Hypertrophy (the dark grey inverted triangle inside the Spinal Canal indicated by the Oblique Arrow.)

Figure 9A (Left): Pre-operative Post-myelographic CT Scan (Sagittal View in the same patient as Figure 8). Grade 1 Spondylolisthesis of L4 on L5. The Arrows indicate the Posterior (back) aspects of the L4 and L5 Vertebral Bodies. L4 sits anterior to L5.

Figure 9B (Right): Intra-operative Lateral Lumbar Spine x-ray after a Minimally Invasive Microsurgical Bilateral L4 and L5 Laminectomy (Unilateral Approach) and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF); Percutaneous Minimally Invasive Bilateral Pedicle Screw & Rod Fixation with Reduction of the Spondylolisthesis. (The Arrow indicates the "markers" imbedded within the "interbody fusion" device.)

Figure 10A (Left): MRI Scan (Sagittal View) in a 73 year old Female with Grade 2 Spondylolisthesis of L4 on L5.

Figure 10B (Right): MRI Scan (Coronal Views-Same Patient) with severe Scoliosis. The Far Right Image has a straight line drawn through the Midline of the uppermost Vertebral Body to demonstrate the extent of this Spinal Curvature.

Figure 11: MRI Scan (Axial View- Same Patient as Figures 10A & 10B). There is severe Spinal Stenosis resulting from the Hypertrophy of the Facets (Horizontal Arrows) and Hypertrophic Ligamentum Flavum which is partially calcified (Bi-directional Arrows.)

NOTE: DESPITE THE SEVERE STENOSIS, SIGNIFICANT (Grade 2) SPONDYLOLISTHESIS AND ROTOSCOLIOSIS IN A 73 YEAR OLD, A MINIMALLY INVASIVE BILATERAL DECOMPRESSIVE LAMINECTOMY (UNILATERAL APPROACH) TOGETHER WITH SOME FORM OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE FIXATION AND STABILIZATION CAN BE SUCCESSFULLY ACCOMPLISHED.

ALTERNATIVE MINIMALLY INVASIVE "FIXATION" SYSTEM

"Interspinous Fixation" is one form of Minimally Invasive "fixation" system that is actually accomplished on an out-patient surgery basis with discharge from the hospital within several hours post-operative (see Figures 4 & 5 above and 12 below). This procedure can be combined with Minimally Invasive Decompressive Laminectomy and some form of "Bone Fusion".

IMPORTANT NOTE

OLDER PATIENTS WITH GRADE 1 SPONDYLOLYSTHESIS (WITH OR WITHOUT THE REMOVAL OF A HERNIATED INTERVERTEBRAL DISC) AND A "COLLAPSED" INTERSPACE MAY NOT REQUIRE A BONE FUSION AS PART OF THE DEFINITIVE OPERATION SINCE THEY MAY WELL NOT SLIP ANY FURTHER. IF THE DISC SPACE IS NOT COLLAPSED THEN SOME FORM OF BONE FUSION IS PROBABLY REQUIRED.

Figure 12A (Left): Intraoperative Lumbar Spine x-ray. (Same Patient as Figures 4A-C and 5 A & B) Minimally Invasive Stabilization of the L4,5 Spondylolisthesis using an "Interspinous Fixation" device. (This was done in conjunction with a Minimally Invasive Right L4,5 Medial Facetectomy, BILATERAL L4 and Superior L5 LAMINECTOMY and L4,5 FORAMENOTOMIES using a UNILATERAL APPROACH with Resection of the Herniated Disc.)

Figure 12B (Center): Photograph of Medtronic's Interspinous (SPIRE) device.

Figure 12C (Right): Antero-posterior X-ray (Same Patient) demonstrating the position of the "Interspinous Device". The "Rotoscoliosis" is also apparent.

NOTE: This patient's pre-operative Neurological deficit resolved rapidly as did her Nerve Root pain and Neurogenic Intermittent Claudication. She was managed on a "Day Surgery" basis and went home within a few hours of the operation.

Additional Information about the Interspinous Device is available on this website


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Spine Universe @ www.spineuniverse.com

e-Surgeon @ http://esurgeon.com/

DISCLAIMER: Every effort has been made by the author (s) to provide accurate and up-to-date information. However, the medical knowledge base is dynamic and errors can occur. By using the information contained herein, the viewer willingly assumes all risks in connection with such use. Neither the author nor Neurosurgical Consultants, p.a. shall be held responsible for errors, omissions in information herein nor liable for any special, consequential, or exemplary damages resulting, in whole or in part, from any viewer(s)' use of or reliance upon, this material.

CLINICAL DISCLAIMER: Clinical information is provided for educational purposes and not as a medical or professional service. Person(s) who are not medical professionals should have clinical information reviewed and interpreted or applied only by the appropriate health professional(s).


Return to Top of Page


This page last edited on 6/23

















All content ©2010 by Neurosurgical Consultants, P.A.
Author, Martin L. Lazar, MD, FACS
All Rights Reserved. See Usage Notices.